Over two hundred years ago Mozart wrote "The Magic Flute" to entertain his audience. Today we go see Batman, Spiderman, Planet of the Monkeys, Jurassic Park and other banalities to entertain ourselves. We hail these comic book directors as our new artists, while we kick, ignore, and punish those who are truly brilliant in our society.
Yes, every age had its mediocrities. But they never had to compete with mass marketing electronic culture. Thanks to great technological breakthroughs in science, we now have the ability to create instantaneously, with the push of button, a moronic culture.
Can we thank the passionless Wall Street greedy barons for this great accomplishment? Or is it just the natural course of the rise and fall of a culture? Is it progress or retrogression?
We have managed to create a spiritually diminished society. We use to listen to music. Now, today kids can only watch music on MTV!! Can they listen without the video?
We used to read books, think and reflect. Today, we sit mesmerized in front of a television set watching insipid and insulting shows. Is this what the inventor of this device had in mind? Or, did the networks manage to improve on his thoughts?
It is the age of wrestling, Jerry Springer, and freaks? Are we so deadened inside that this is the only thing that can awaken us?
We use to create beautiful buildings for the eye, soul, and the body. Today we live in the age of functional cold sheet rock. We have only managed to make buildings cheaper and faster, but not better.
We used to sit and really listen to our stereo records on high fidelity equipment. Today ninety percent of all people listen to music on five dollar plastic computer speakers while do something else.
We used to watch journalists on the six o'clock news. Now we watch good looking entertainers.
There used to be a time when a classical record company could sell a great American Orchestra. Unfortunately, due to the great job we have done in our school systems educating this generation about classical music, we cannot even give an orchestral recording away for free.
What is happening to the aesthetics of listening in this decade of popular music? Popular music in the thirties and forties was created by formally trained and technically accomplished musicians. The likes of Benny Goodman and Glen Miller were icons of popular musical culture, yet they had been schooled in the received traditions and produced well-crafted works. The writers Ellington, Gershwin, and Cole Porter had talents appreciated by the masses yet their popular appeal rested on a similar foundation of historically accepted standards of style and principles of form.
Why is it you never see great jazz musicians today playing the hits of rock or rap bands? Most simply cannot tolerate such juvenile writing. The harmonic language has no movement except a few basic chords. Is this the dumbing down of music in our society?
I recently went to the Jazz Educators Conference in New York and had the pleasure of hearing talented young students play. I was impressed by the level of their accomplishment. It pains me that most will end up playing in cocktail lounges and weddings because in our contemporary society, we have little use for them.
Our culture doesn't value musical and artistic skill much anymore. We honor and reward mediocrity. Our society only asks for reliable mediocrity. We worship pop heroes who cannot find middle C on the piano.
Why do we ignore truly talented, young, and up and coming artists and make musical illiterate people rich and famous? Was this always a trend or is this the new norm in our new fast-food, pop culture aesthetics?
The amount of money we spend on sound and music today is inversely proportionate to its quality. Our values are changing. We no longer believe in the pursuit of excellence.
A culture is remembered for the art it produces. The Greeks the Romans the Egyptians produced works that continue to awe and inspire us after two thousand years. Asian societies had similar aesthetic goals for excellence. They gave us the Taj Mahal and Angor Watt, to name a few.
What will today's America be remembered for?
Perhaps a society where the only value and sense of accomplishment is the pursuit of money with no great desire to pursue ideological excellence.
Will the new framework of our society be a frame work for ignorance? We have no values and we are spiritually diminished. We are becoming empty as a society, and our art will reflect this.
The multinational companies running the world will soon have the power to declare an artist of the month, like a centerfold, destined to be disposed of to make room for next month's super-artist.
George Orwell's prophesy has come true. But he missed the mark by a little. It is not the government that has become big brother, but cooperate America. And they did not have to use terrorist’s tactics. We gladly gave up our mind and souls of our own free will.
Welcome to the new millennium - substance not required!
David Chesky
Thursday, February 15, 2007
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
It's About the Sound!
I am tired of hearing music critics tell me it's about the music not the sound when they hear a recording.
Well, it's not. It is about the sound.
Why? Because, what is music?
Music is just the organization of sounds. In the natural world there are sounds all around us. The natural order of the world's sounds is chaotic. A composer rejects this world and organizes the sound into a form that he or she thinks is aesthetically pleasing to the ear. In the modern world of recordings we cannot separate sound from music anymore. In the old days when we had limited technology, this could be overlooked, but not today when we have the means to reproduce sound with such precision.
The Double Standard!
Lets go back to the first line, It's about the music not the sound.
Well is not tonality a big part of music?
Why is this very important aspect of music entirely overlooked by most reviewers?
I would think that a great violinist works lifetime to achieve a beautiful tone. This is why we hold Stradivarius and Guaneri violins in such high regard, for their beautiful tones. The tone is the poetry that moves our souls when we hear music. We can read the notes on the page if we want to know what the melody, harmony, or counterpoint is, but it is the physical sound of the instrument that moves us. When you go to a concert hall you expect this from an orchestra. For years people always said, -"I love the rich sound of the Philadelphia strings"- when referring to that orchestra!
"They loved their tone !!
They loved their sound!!
So why is it acceptable for orchestras to sound like they are playing on instruments that are made of plywood when they make a recording?
Why do I need to hear loud down bows that can rip my ear off and do not resemble anything I consider pleasing on many classical CD's?
THIS IS A DOUBLE STANDARD.
I want my orchestra strings to sound real and rich like in a live concert hall,
this is why we spend so much money constructing beautiful sounding concert halls. If a concert artist produced a sound like I hear on recordings that many magazines rave about, they would be run out of the business! I recently bought a new stereo system for my home. I love to listen to music at night. But I will tell you this, I do not care how good the performance is, if it goes on my main system and it sounds bright and hard, it immediately is shut off.
Why ?
Because this is not what I consider to be my esthetic concept of what beautiful music should be. If it is bad and I still want to hear it, I will play it on my little system in the kitchen and listen in the distance where the flaws of the recording do not irritate my ears! When I do play something on my system I want to be moved by the sound of the music. I want to hear the same beautiful tones coming from my speakers as in great concert hall. I would not expect less in a concert hall, so why should WE expect less in our homes? So it is about the sound!! So the next time I read a review in a magazine that tells me how great this CD is and I buy it, it better sound great or I will be mad! This is why we at Chesky spend so much time on sound. Because sound is music, and one cannot go with out the other in the modern recording world. I think with the new AREA 31 recording we are getting closer to the absolute sound more than anyone else to date. So in the end it is not about being an audiophile or not an audiophile. Maybe we're right, and just maybe they are just wrong!
David Chesky
Well, it's not. It is about the sound.
Why? Because, what is music?
Music is just the organization of sounds. In the natural world there are sounds all around us. The natural order of the world's sounds is chaotic. A composer rejects this world and organizes the sound into a form that he or she thinks is aesthetically pleasing to the ear. In the modern world of recordings we cannot separate sound from music anymore. In the old days when we had limited technology, this could be overlooked, but not today when we have the means to reproduce sound with such precision.
The Double Standard!
Lets go back to the first line, It's about the music not the sound.
Well is not tonality a big part of music?
Why is this very important aspect of music entirely overlooked by most reviewers?
I would think that a great violinist works lifetime to achieve a beautiful tone. This is why we hold Stradivarius and Guaneri violins in such high regard, for their beautiful tones. The tone is the poetry that moves our souls when we hear music. We can read the notes on the page if we want to know what the melody, harmony, or counterpoint is, but it is the physical sound of the instrument that moves us. When you go to a concert hall you expect this from an orchestra. For years people always said, -"I love the rich sound of the Philadelphia strings"- when referring to that orchestra!
"They loved their tone !!
They loved their sound!!
So why is it acceptable for orchestras to sound like they are playing on instruments that are made of plywood when they make a recording?
Why do I need to hear loud down bows that can rip my ear off and do not resemble anything I consider pleasing on many classical CD's?
THIS IS A DOUBLE STANDARD.
I want my orchestra strings to sound real and rich like in a live concert hall,
this is why we spend so much money constructing beautiful sounding concert halls. If a concert artist produced a sound like I hear on recordings that many magazines rave about, they would be run out of the business! I recently bought a new stereo system for my home. I love to listen to music at night. But I will tell you this, I do not care how good the performance is, if it goes on my main system and it sounds bright and hard, it immediately is shut off.
Why ?
Because this is not what I consider to be my esthetic concept of what beautiful music should be. If it is bad and I still want to hear it, I will play it on my little system in the kitchen and listen in the distance where the flaws of the recording do not irritate my ears! When I do play something on my system I want to be moved by the sound of the music. I want to hear the same beautiful tones coming from my speakers as in great concert hall. I would not expect less in a concert hall, so why should WE expect less in our homes? So it is about the sound!! So the next time I read a review in a magazine that tells me how great this CD is and I buy it, it better sound great or I will be mad! This is why we at Chesky spend so much time on sound. Because sound is music, and one cannot go with out the other in the modern recording world. I think with the new AREA 31 recording we are getting closer to the absolute sound more than anyone else to date. So in the end it is not about being an audiophile or not an audiophile. Maybe we're right, and just maybe they are just wrong!
David Chesky
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)